Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:03

Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is your review of House of the Dragon, season 2, episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
King Charles praised for 'faultless' firing technique at Larkhill - BBC
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Flight attendant reportedly found naked during flight from SFO - SFGATE
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
World-First: Scientists Capture a Rare Lightning-Triggered Gamma-Ray Burst - SciTechDaily
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Resident Evil 9, Requiem, Announced At Summer Game Fest With Trailer And Release Date - GameSpot
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Quo adipisci nostrum sunt ut ducimus quaerat sit quaerat.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
European leaders worry they’re too reliant on U.S. tech - TechCrunch